Why an engagement programme won't fix your execution

There is a moment in every high-performing team where something shifts.

People stop delivering their part and start delivering together. 

They challenge each other not because someone told them to, but because they care about the outcome. They close gaps nobody assigned them.

That is collective commitment. And in execution, it is everything. 

Because no strategy is delivered by one person or one function. 

It crosses boundaries, it requires trade-offs, and the governance system will never be fast enough to catch what falls between them. 

At some point, the strategy depends on people choosing to go beyond what was asked of them.

When that starts to fade, most organisations reach for an engagement programme. 

But engagement and collective commitment are not the same thing. 

When I was researching strategy execution, this was one of the clearest findings. Engagement matters - when people feel pride and belonging, they perform better. 

But it is an enabler, not a driver. 

It creates the conditions where people can execute. It does not create the collective will to deliver a strategy together.

That choice is not a personality trait, and it is not an engagement score. It is built in how the executive team behaves under pressure, which is the work in Leadership.

This is part of lever 6 (Performance & Commitment) of the Strategy Execution by Design Model.
See the full framework →

Not sure which of the seven conditions is holding your execution back?
Take the Strategy Execution Maturity Model Assessment →

Written by Rebecca Reti, strategy and execution consultant working with boards and executive teams across Australia and New Zealand.

This one prompted a lot of conversation on LinkedIn.
Join the discussion on LinkedIn →